Mon Feb 12, 7: Be prepared to not hear ANY difference at all. UV is quite similar to POW-r 1 in sound and technology not traditional noise shaping , so I’m wondering why they bothered to add this choice. No dither truncation to 16 bits makes for a slightly more mid-rangy sound overall, probably due to the distortion artifacts. It’s basically colored dither, not traditional noise shaping. The distortion can be very obvious in tails during mastering. Sun Sep 30, 8:
|Date Added:||22 January 2011|
|File Size:||12.63 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
This is something you will only ever hear in very very quiet passage or on the very uv22hr of uv2hr fade out. Mon Uv22hr 12, 7: If you do a google search for “dither shoot out” you should fine a audio comparison between all the major dithers. Lagerfeldt, I’d be curious to know if you’re talking about hearing differences between dithers where the program material is above, say, dBFS, while monitoring at 85dBA SPL or so, and uv22hr if you have done this as a blind test.
What is uv22hr, when do I use it and for what. –
No dither truncation to 16 bits makes for a slightly more mid-rangy sound overall, uv22nr due to the distortion artifacts. Thu May 04, You’ll see there is uv22hr uv2hr between them.
I find uv22hr differences between the dithers, uv22hr at regular listening levels. Great for classical music and dynamic acoustic music. POW-r 2 I never use because the noise shaping is too sharp and the dynamic results don’t make up for it.
Logic Pro Help
Hackintosh i5 K 4. POW-r 3 yields very good dynamic results but the noise shaping is a bit obvious in the kHz area, so not always my first choice for pop music. Sat Jul 05, 5: If you can’t hear uv22hr difference between dither types but want to avoid uv22hr distortion vu22hr I recommend you use POW-r 1 when you bounce to 16 bit.
MacBook Pro with Logic 9.
Apogee UV22HR – how do you rate this versus Pow-r? – Logic Pro Help
It’s basically colored dither, not traditional noise shaping. Sun Sep 30, 8: Wed Feb 10, 3: And it’s “noisy”, but not a problem in most cases and it uv22hr beats truncation. Thu Feb 25, uv22h POW-r uv22hrr is my favorite choice uv22hr I’m not dealing with high fidelity dynamic material. Thu Feb 25, 5: UV is quite similar to POW-r 1 in sound and technology not traditional noise shapingso I’m wondering why they bothered to add this choice.
I haven’t tested UV22 recently but I’ll do that soon. Hv22hr curious to see if UV22HR is preferred when dithering to bit, or are uv22hr Pow-r options better?
The distortion can be very obvious in tails during mastering. Sat Jan 17, 1: Uv22hr for the best possible sound resolution when bouncing bit recordings into bit files. In the Weiss hardware units I like 2 better which makes me think 2 uv22br uv22hr differently or bugged in Logic Pro.
Be prepared to not hear ANY difference at all.