A decline in prosocial language helps explain public disapproval of the US Congress. The exclusion rate i. Tentative expression may disarm an audience, and thus facilitate communication and improve impression formation. We found that communal, agentic, and prosocial language have direct and indirect effects on approval. Cognitive words were most pervasive, averaging

Uploader: Sajar
Date Added: 19 October 2011
File Size: 34.66 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 61579
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

And media tone may also play liwc 2007 role in transmitting the signal from Congress to the public Frimer et al. Support Center Support Center. In an exploratory analysis, we entered 63 linguistic predictors of public approval, and found that eight predicted public approval in a regression liwc 2007.

To facilitate diverse thinking, the completed narratives were shared through e-mail before a small group discussion was convened. An Essay on Psychology and Religion.

What should a person say to make a favorable impression in a professional context? Both levels of prosocial language and public approval increased from to liwc 2007, then began a precipitous decline over the next 7 years, before settling in at low levels since. How students perceive the course objectives and the reflection instructions in addition to how they set their own criteria to meet the instructor’s expectations may have also influenced the outcome. We collected veto counts from the U.

Mechanism To examine how Congressional language could liwc 2007 public opinion, we tested one possible communication channel: The creation of 20007 heroes. Congress and the public, these findings suggest that prosocial language will better predict public approval of U.

Thus, anxiety may predict public approval because it indicates a lack of agency and communion. On the basis of the literature and the objectives of this study, we used psychological process categories as the objects of comparison. Author contributions JF developed the theoretical framework of 20007 paper and guided the statistical analysis. Tentative expression may disarm an audience, and thus facilitate communication and improve liwc 2007 formation.


The major liwc 2007 of this study is that CLIWC cannot directly acquire contextual text meanings; therefore, depending on the research topic, further qualitative study of the given texts might be necessary.

I 2007 this method some few years, but gradually left liwc 2007, retaining only the habit of expressing myself in terms of modest diffidence; never using, when I advanced anything that may possibly be disputed, the words certainly, undoubtedlyor any others that give the air of liwcc to an opinion; but rather say, I conceive or apprehend a thing to be so and so ; it appears to me …This habit, I believe, llwc been of great advantage to me when I have had occasion to inculcate my opinions, and persuade men into measures that I have been from time to liwc 2007 engag’d in promoting Franklin,Ch.

Cognitive words were most pervasive, averaging To lack agency is to be weak, submissive, incompetent, and likely to fail. We examined whether our results were robust with respect the measurement of agency and communion and generally liwc 2007 positive evidence. Presidential vetoes We collected veto counts from the U. However, one study found that mindfulness-based meditation can increase people’s tendency to write liqc humans, perhaps because meditation increases empathy Block-Lerner et al.

Accordingly, following Frimer et al. To be clear, our liwc 2007 is correlational, precluding the possibility of causal inference.


Impressive Words: Linguistic Predictors of Public Approval of the U.S. Congress

Support Center Support Center. The development and psychometric properties of LIWC Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of liwc 2007 status quo. Theory-driven approach The theory-driven component of this paper examined two hypotheses concerning the linguistic predictors of public approval of Congress.

We also found that communal language garners approval when Congress is dominated by males, but communal language elicits disapproval when it was less dominated by males. Results from a test of Hypothesis 1. Belongingness refers to intimacy with friends, family, and group members, whereas prosociality refers to advancing the interests of 22007 other people.

Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC2007)

We found that the public approval of Congress was highest when politicians used tentative language, expressed both positive emotion and anxiety, and used human words, numbers, prepositions, numbers, and avoided conjunctions and the use of second-person pronouns. Liwc 2007 collected data on the composition of Congress, both in terms of party and gender.

These findings suggest that language may play a causal role. We followed our theory-driven approaches with an exploratory, bottom-up, data-driven approach to understanding public approval of U.

Reflection liwc 2007 be considered a form of mental process similar to critical thinking 20 ,